plainservice
Activist
Posts:139
 |
| 22/05/2009 8:31 AM |
 Alert
|
Many of our MPs have fiddles expenses e.g. mortgages that did not exist etc... and they will happily take money. The question is did they take bribes?
|
|
|
|
|
bobed
Activist
Posts:122
|
| 25/05/2009 1:42 AM |
Alert
|
| http://www.theherald.co.uk/features/featuresopinon/display.var.2510107.0.Curb_property_addiction_to_avoid_another_disaster.php
Sums it up |
|
|
|
|
slicedcake
Activist
Posts:467
|
| 06/06/2009 1:59 AM |
Alert
|
| In my opinion, stopping MPs from becoming taxpayer subsidised "second home" property speculators would help a lot. The vested interests in property has lead to a conflict of interests. This IS almost as bad as taking bribes. A fixed salary for London based MPs and an additional amount for MPs with constituencies outside of London. Something like a certain amount extra per mile outside the M25. That would simplify the accounting and reduce the amount of taxpayer funded property. |
|
|
|
|
slicedcake
Activist
Posts:467
|
|